Rethinking Political Bargaining: Policymaking with a Single Proposer
نویسنده
چکیده
Most political bargaining in the U.S. system has two features which are constitutionally mandated: (1) only one actor can make a formal proposal, and (2) he or she can make an indefinite number of proposals. Existing work in economics and political science ignores at least one of these features. I construct a model incorporating both of these components of political bargaining. The main finding of this article is that time preferences and the number of periods have no effect on the equilibrium policy outcomes, which are identical to those first stated by Romer and Rosenthal in a one-period model. This result suggests that impatience and time preferences may not be key features of political bargaining. This model has implications for constitutional and statutory rules regarding bargaining: it can be applied to presidential appointments, legislation, citizen initiatives, vetoes and filibusters (e.g., Krehbiel’s pivotal politics model), and term limits.
منابع مشابه
Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining
We study a model of sequential bargaining in which, in each period before an agreement is reached, a proposer is randomly selected, the proposer suggests a division of a pie of size one, each other agent either approves or rejects the proposal, and the proposal is implemented if the set of approving agents is a winning coalition for the proposer. We show that stationary equilibrium outcomes of ...
متن کاملOne-dimensional bargaining with Markov recognition probabilities
We study a process of bargaining over alternatives represented by points in the unit interval. The identity of the proposer is determined by a general Markov process and the acceptance of a proposal requires the approval of it by all the players. We show that for every value of the continuation probability below one the subgame perfect equilibrium in stationary strategies is essentially unique ...
متن کاملGender and Culture: International Experimental Evidence From Trust Games
Gender is rarely included as a factor in economics models. However, recent work in experimental economics, as well as in psychology and political science, suggests that gender is an important determinant of economic and strategic behavior. We examine gender differences in bargaining using the ‘‘trust game’’ introduced by Joyce Berg et al. (1995). In this two-person game, the ‘‘proposer’’ is giv...
متن کاملNon-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash bargaining solution
Our work contributes to the game-theoretic analysis of bargaining by providing additional non-cooperative support to the well-known Nash bargaining solution. In particular, in the present paper we study a model of non-cooperative multilateral bargaining with a very general proposer selection protocol and set of feasible payoffs. In each period of the bargaining game, one out of n players is rec...
متن کاملBargaining Structure, Fairness, and Efficiency
Experiments with the ultimatum game—where one party can make a take-it-or-leave-it offer to a second party on how to split a pie—illustrate that conventional game theory has been wrong in its predictions regarding the simplest of bargaining settings: Even when one party has enormous bargaining power, she may be able to extract all the surplus from trade, because the second party will reject gro...
متن کامل